Shooting RAW – Why should I do this?

There’s a stubborn myth in the photography world: “Real” photos shouldn’t be edited. Some believe that post-processing somehow fakes reality — that only untouched images are honest. But that idea doesn’t hold up. Whether film or digital, a photo is never finished at the moment you press the shutter. It’s finished in the process — and editing is part of that process. Without it, an image remains incomplete.

Why You Should Develop Your Photos — And Why JPG Just Doesn’t Cut It

Digital cameras make it easy: turn it on, point, shoot, save — done. Most people leave their camera in auto mode and save their shots as JPG. It’s convenient, quick, and saves space.

But if you want the best out of your images, you need to develop them — and for that, you need the right foundation. JPG is the wrong tool for the job.

And let’s get one thing out of the way: editing your photos isn’t “cheating.” Photo editing has always been a core part of photography.

Developing Photos: Then and Now

What many forget: even in the film era, a photo wasn’t finished the moment it was shot. The negative had to be developed, exposed, dodged, burned, sharpened, and printed. The final look came from the darkroom, not the camera.

Today, that darkroom is digital. The tools are programs like Lightroom, Capture One, DxO, or Darktable. And this isn’t about trendy filters — it’s about unlocking the full potential of your image: light, color, contrast, mood. Creating a look intentionally, not leaving it to chance or automation.

JPG vs. RAW: Two Different Worlds

JPG:

  • A compressed final product
  • Auto-processed by the camera
  • Image data is discarded
  • Minimal room for editing

RAW:

  • An unprocessed digital negative
  • All image data preserved
  • Full control over exposure, color, contrast
  • Ideal for professional editing

Dynamic Range: RAW’s Secret Weapon

Dynamic range is the ability to preserve detail in both the brightest and darkest parts of an image — from deep shadows to bright highlights.

  • Analog film (like Kodak Portra or Ilford FP4) has a smooth contrast curve and excellent highlight tolerance — perfect for portraits or tricky light, but limited to max. 10 to 12 stops of dynamic range.
  • Modern digital sensors can capture up to 14–15 stops of dynamic range — sometimes even more. BUT: only if you shoot in RAW.

If you shoot in JPG, the camera compresses the file and clips that valuable information. Blown-out skies and pitch-black shadows? Lost forever.

RAW Without Editing Is a Wasted Opportunity

RAW images look flat at first — low contrast, muted colors — and that’s exactly how they should look. Because they’re not finished. They’re meant to be developed.

Shooting RAW but skipping the editing process makes no sense. You might as well shoot JPG if you’re not going to take advantage of what RAW offers.

A RAW file is like an uncut diamond — its value is unlocked through processing. Exposure, white balance, shadows, highlights — none of it is final in a RAW. That’s the whole point.

Editing Is Not Cheating — It’s Photography

There’s a myth out there: “Real photos don’t need editing.” That’s false.

Every great photographer edits. In the film era, it was done with chemicals and light. Today, it’s sliders and curves. It’s not about faking reality — it’s about interpreting it. About enhancing mood, correcting color, recovering detail.

Editing isn’t a shortcut — it’s craftsmanship.

JPG Falls Apart in Challenging Situations

Some real-world scenarios where JPG just doesn’t hold up:

  • High contrast scenes: blown-out skies and crushed shadows.
  • Wrong white balance: nearly impossible to fix in JPG.
  • Underexposed shots: heavy noise and color issues when trying to brighten.
  • Creative looks or precise adjustments: very limited flexibility.

Final Thoughts: RAW + Editing = Full Creative Control

  • JPG is like a fully baked cake: ready to consume, no changes allowed.
  • RAW is the dough: you can shape it, flavor it, and bake it the way you want.

And yes, it takes more time and effort. But that’s where the real quality comes from — from the control, the decisions, the freedom.

Photography doesn’t end at the shutter click — that’s where it begins.

Comments

3 responses to “Shooting RAW – Why should I do this?”

  1. an artist Avatar
    an artist

    Hi, thank you for this … the ongoing fight between ideologists and real photographers …

  2. Matko Avatar
    Matko

    Thanks for the great tip! Would you be interested in making 10 steps tutorial, in let’s say Lightroom, on how to use and improve that RAW image?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *